|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hehehe. Straighterway, observe the elements of ideology coming into play: cynicism, sarcasm, bewilderment, etc. As I said, those 'archaic subterfuges' serve a very definite purpose. Hesiodic Thog: mix the true with the untrue, letting the one support the other. D.W. is nearly an in situ discovery. Get the point Doctor?
|
|
|||
|
get WHAT point?
Your lack of a point is a lack of a point is a lack of a point. As we saw when you railroaded the discussion about Judaism in Russia, not having anything to say is no handicap to a gentleman as pathologically prone to public preening as yourself. "Publish and be spammed" - your credo, I believe? Does it occur to you how discourteous it is to other users of this board to spam it with irrelevant topics in inappropriate sections? If you have no other outlet for your inclinations towards playing warped psychological games, could you at least confine their outpourings to the Open Board section? I know that asks you to talk about "anything", rather than talk about nothing, but I'm prepared to ignore the semantic difference in favour of having the board sections used with some degree of courtesy to fellow-users. I and others are on slow modem connections which cut-out frequently - perhaps you could post your philosophical Escherisms in a section I could more readily ignore? Thank you. Dr W. |
|
|||
|
It of course has never occurred to you how asinine it is of you to institute yourself as final arbitrator of what others are or are not suppose to consider here, or any other place. Talking about an ego trip. What, Doctor(?), are your credentials that lets you assume such self-importance? As stated elsewhere, it is probably 'nomos'. How blatantly obvious can one get in a silly attempt to find self-worth?
|
|
|||
|
To All: if in the course of daily activies one can't study and understand others, then how in the hell is anyone suppose to understand the self? Dr. W's objection to being brought under the microscope of inquiry as to the type of person he might be is is indicative of a desire to hid behind empty words and soulless prater.>>>>>>> I believe the word is eschar and not escher, Doctor. But since you are an escharotic product, you must know the difference.
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +3. The time now is 11:38.





Linear Mode
