Russia Forums Community


Go Back   Russia.com Discussion Forum > Culture > History
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 27th March 2004, 03:16
limey_defence limey_defence is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,542
Is King Charles I 2000 years ago now? I don't think so.
So, with King Charles I, it was some random person they chopped the head off. The parliamentarian revolt lead by Cromwell was against some imaginary person.
And his name was written in a book. It is written in several accounts of him, by several different people and at several different times. The paintings of him all look alike. Tell me, what did Jesus look like?

I like the way you mentioned King Arthur then got rid of Merlin and such. Well, we don't know whether he existed or not. The castle that was that to apparently to house the round table holds no real proof, only tales and myths. With his Merlin, Jesus had turning water into wine. Which, we all know cannot be done. It's a fairey tale. Maybe we should believe in Darth Vader and the Star Wars galaxy, it has to be true, I saw them with my own eyes. It's all there in books and even in video documentaries called movies.
Maybe this Mel Gibson movie proves he existed. And did all those things he did. It's amazing, but really if you can't hold evidence you can't claim he was the greatest man alive.

For Charles I and Henry VIII there's several accounts, by several people, at several times with several painting all describing the same man, in the same way.
Jesus has a book call the bible thats testaments change from believer to believer. Different kind of Chrisitians argue with one another about how to worship him and the different reasons he did the different things. No hard evidence stands when all the people who claim he existed argue amongst one another and even war to try and prove their point.

Do the historians who say that Henry VIII existed war because they claim they should worship him slightly different? After all, look at Henry VIII he headed up a new way of worshipping Jesus and God, he couldn't of existed.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 27th March 2004, 04:08
rikbe rikbe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Flanders/Jutland
Posts: 5,945
Quote:
Originally posted by Panzerschreck
Quote:
Originally posted by limey_defence
Jesus? But wait...there is actually no proof he ever existed getting his name out of some book written so long ago cannot say he ever existed. And a man who never existed cannot be the greatest man in history.
How could you ever know if King Charles 1 ever existed?? his name was written in a book. After two thousand years, will people of that time belive that King Charles 1 existed?
But did King Arthur really existed??(Minus Merlin and other magic)
No King Arthur didn't exist. He was a figure of a novel.

If I only consider men that I am sure that really exist, I only know one great man: me. The other I know are from books, newspapers and TV and all these could be fake.
__________________


Diderot:
A deist is someone who has not lived long enough to become an atheist.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 28th March 2004, 07:26
Rain Rain is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,678
Talking

"My choice of [Prophet] Muhammad to lead the list of the world's most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular level."

Michael H. Hart, THE 100: A RANKING OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL PERSONS IN HISTORY, New York: Hart Publishing Company, Inc., 1978, p. 33.


"Philosopher, orator, apostle, legislator, warrior, conqueror of ideas, restorer of rational dogmas, of a cult without images; the founder of twenty terrestrial empires and of one spiritual empire, that is Muhammad. As regards all standards by which human greatness may be measured, we may well ask, is there any man greater than he?"


Lamartine, HISTOIRE DE LA TURQUIE, Paris, 1854, Vol. II, pp. 276-277.

__________________
"Every man dies, not every man really lives"
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 28th March 2004, 13:18
limey_defence limey_defence is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,542
And we may ask, who gives a damn what they think?
Your opinion Rain, not some rectal warts.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 28th March 2004, 18:16
Panzerschreck Panzerschreck is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 73
Jesus was, and is the Son of God, what can he not do?? Just because you saw Star Wars that means it existed, then did you see King Charles before?? If so, go watch 'The Passion of Christ' and then believe.
And I didn't say that King Charles existed 2000 years ago, I meant in 4000a.d, will people believe in King Charles.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2004, 03:50
rikbe rikbe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Flanders/Jutland
Posts: 5,945
Quote:
Originally posted by Rain
"My choice of [Prophet] Muhammad to lead the list of the world's most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular level."

Michael H. Hart, THE 100: A RANKING OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL PERSONS IN HISTORY, New York: Hart Publishing Company, Inc., 1978, p. 33.


"Philosopher, orator, apostle, legislator, warrior, conqueror of ideas, restorer of rational dogmas, of a cult without images; the founder of twenty terrestrial empires and of one spiritual empire, that is Muhammad. As regards all standards by which human greatness may be measured, we may well ask, is there any man greater than he?"


Lamartine, HISTOIRE DE LA TURQUIE, Paris, 1854, Vol. II, pp. 276-277.

I don't know H. Hart but I read something from Lamartine a long time ago. I don't remember what but I remember I didn't like it. I had to read it in highschool. It was a French poet, and I would not never take a poet as reference in a philosophical matter. Or any other matter.
__________________


Diderot:
A deist is someone who has not lived long enough to become an atheist.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 29th March 2004, 04:02
Rain Rain is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,678
Arrow

Well, I think Muhammad was the Greatest ( not the boxer, the Prophet ). He wasnt good or bad, he was Just and Equitable. That balance is what the world needs, the rest leads to corruption or zeal...

R
__________________
"Every man dies, not every man really lives"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +3. The time now is 06:53.

All Rights Reserved © 1995 - | NewMedia Holdings, Inc. The Russia Channel is operated under license to Paley Media, Inc. which is solely responsible for its content. All trademarks and web sites that appear throughout this site are the property of their respective owners. No part of this site shall be reproduced, copied, or otherwise distributed without the express, written consent of Paley Media, Inc. This site is not affiliated with any government entity associated with a name similar to the site domain name.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC4 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.