Go Back   Russia.com Discussion Forum > Culture > History
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11th October 2004, 04:25
newquantum newquantum is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
The two biggest rogues ever since Human's history began controlled two strongest countries in the world except US at that time to slaughter and ruin each other using all the wealth power, man power and intelligence power.
The above is the sentence I wrote in a Chinese civil cccpist forum. It was deleted nearly at once by the administrator who is extremely leftsided I think. In my opinion, if we throw away all the factors such as ideology, the eternal standard of distinguishing right and wrong can be left very simple and clear: whether you are friendly with others.
__________________
I am a Chinese fan of Russia. I am looking for Russian pen pals sincerely.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11th October 2004, 07:51
Voyager13b Voyager13b is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,467
Quote:
Originally posted by newquantum
The two biggest rogues ever since Human's history began controlled two strongest countries in the world except US at that time to slaughter and ruin each other using all the wealth power, man power and intelligence power.
The above is the sentence I wrote in a Chinese civil cccpist forum. It was deleted nearly at once by the administrator who is extremely leftsided I think. In my opinion, if we throw away all the factors such as ideology, the eternal standard of distinguishing right and wrong can be left very simple and clear: whether you are friendly with others.
Stalin was a rogue dictator by most accounts (at least as bad as Hitler in my view), and in his time, he exacted a heavy price on the world, but I doubt that WWII could be described simply as a battle between the two biggest rogue leaders in human history.

First, considering the popluation of the world, and the distribution of that population at the time, there were other wars and killing sprees that had at least as profound an effect on the growth of civilization as did WWII. To compare in terms of body count alone has little to do with the total effect of the war, as there were far more (connected) people available to fight in WWI than there were in some of the major battles of the past.

That's similar to claiming that the defecit of the US is at an all time high. In total Dollars, that is quite true, but as a percentage of either total Dollars in circulation, or compared to the total number of Dollars that are active in the US economy from year to year, the effect of the large defecit is diminished.

The same with WWII. There were other wars in history that spilled far less blood, yet caused greater damage to the growth of civilization. The sacrifice made by millions of people during WWII ended up producing a bipolar world, but also made the globe so much smaller in an information sense, that the following cold war can be looked at as a relatively peacefull time in human history.

Second, even though I view Stalin as one of the worst human influences in history, I beg to differ about your idea that WWII was all about the will of two "rogue leaders". Hitler was all about expanding the German border well into the Soviet Union from the outset of the war. He used his hatred for communism as a tool to gain domestic and world support for his plans, but it seems to me that the real issue in play was that in Hitler's view, Russians (Slavs in general) were just not worthy of being in command of so much real estate, while the "pure race" centered in Germany was so humiliated at the end of WWI, and apparently limited in it's possibilities for geographic expansion for all time, that something drastic had to be done.

Stalin or no Stalin, the German beast with the funky haircut was determined to one day call central Russia his own property in the name of the Fatherland. Stalin or no Stalin, it was Russia, it's sons, and it's daughters that got their act together for the sake of survival as a people, and beat the beast back first to Berlin, and then to suicide.

Others here will argue that Stalin was as wonderful a leader as I decry him as having been a despot, but I think we can all agree that Hitler invaded Russia, and that in the end, Russians beat the hell out of Hitler. Stalin was still getting the ball rolling on his own version of hell on Earth while Hitler was getting his nuts roasted by the very people he thought to be backward and good for nothing in civil society. No offense, but in my view, neither the price paid, nor the immortal statement made by the defenders of Russia against Germany during WWII can ever be expressed in one sentence. Nor should the feat be attempted, as to do so can only result in offering to forget more than needs to be remembered.

Counting the numbers of nations that you are freindly with is no justification of self. Freinds are important in all levels of life, but freindships can suffer through a few years of of political ice age without one deciding to kill the other just because it would be nice to have a larger back yard.

Voyager

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11th October 2004, 08:46
T-34_Fanatic T-34_Fanatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 122
All in all Voyager is pretty well correct. Hitler wanted Russia's vast amounts of resources for his conception of an Aryan race. But as ruthless a leader Stalin was there is something he must be creditted to; that is his without his industrialisation of Russia tanks (T-34s hehe) would have not rolled out so fast or in such great numbers. The motivation of the Russian people some accredit to Stalin also but this is not the case. Russians and the Soviet people were still idealistic and optimistic of their newly found communist system, especially the Hebrew/Jewish population, and went to their deaths defending it. Whether Stalin was there or not, if it had been Trotsky for example the same result would have most likely applied. Stalin put technology and advancement before the welfare and lives of his people this resulted in an extravagant loss of lives, but it cannot be denied that he had an affect on civilization.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11th October 2004, 09:17
newquantum newquantum is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
First, thank you very much for your perfect comments.
Second, to Voyager13b, it's clear in the title that the war between USSR and Germany, never WWII.
Third, I never attempt to summarize completely about the war. It's impossible. But sometimes simple and one-sided expression can give some fresh and valuable viewpoint. I wrote the sentence from my mind spark that I realized under the battle smoke and the brilliance of marshal's medals, there are slaughter and ruin to averages. Unfortunatly, some common people enjoy the glory of victory on battle fields, even somehow have the desire for another battle, but are blind to the huge pain of themselves. I want to emphasize that all the wars are slaughters within human beings. Even though some wars are inevitable or could promote civilization, I don't wish to see them.
__________________
I am a Chinese fan of Russia. I am looking for Russian pen pals sincerely.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 18th October 2006, 09:20
harmonicpursuit harmonicpursuit is offline
Quarantined User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 43
Hitler ****ed with the wrong bear on the wrong day.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 24th December 2006, 20:32
MaxPower MaxPower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 50
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonicpursuit View Post
Hitler ****ed with the wrong bear on the wrong day.


Yeah!


No more needs to be said
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28th December 2006, 18:41
p_panzerschreck's Avatar
p_panzerschreck p_panzerschreck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 347
War between Germany and USSR in one sentence: “something that happened, 60 years ago.”
__________________


The world isn't fair,
Why make it fair.
By being unfair,
The world will be fair.
Communism is the alliance between lower-middle class people and workers to overcome the parasitic capitalist exploiter who lives off the fruits of the small people and accumulates a wealth so large without being able to appreciate its value.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +3. The time now is 07:14.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC4 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.