Go Back   Russia.com Discussion Forum > Society > Russian Politics


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 20th September 2002, 01:49
mimaYU mimaYU is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3
I am curious to know what does Russians mean about their president,generally.
Is he popular,right person to lead people or not?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 24th September 2002, 21:47
HATALbR HATALbR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,946
Welcome to russia.com!

A public [internet poll] could yield valuable information; however, objective research is better.

Vladimir Putin has QUITE the resume. I discovered his resume while researching the process for acquiring visa for travel to Russia.

Personally, I like the guy. I believe he will do great things for Russia. He's one tough, savvy, powerful man.

Good Luck!
Natalie
aka Natasha
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 24th September 2002, 22:00
davlet davlet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,456
Quote:
Originally posted by mimaYU
I am curious to know what does Russians mean about their president,generally.
Is he popular,right person to lead people or not?
He is quite popular in Russia as far as I know. I am one Russian who is not overly enthusiastic about him (nor dismissive) -- he simply hasn't done anything spectacular (good or bad) yet.

Actually most of my Russian friends are as distrustful of Russian politicians as I am... but on the average he is doing very, very well in the public polls.


__________________
Never fear, I is here
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 26th September 2002, 02:20
titoman titoman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,175
Yeah, Putin really puts it in.

I don´t like that Bonapartist, tho´.
__________________

“Nature is the proof of dialectics, and it must be said for modern science that it has furnished this proof with very rich materials increasing daily.”

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 26th September 2002, 21:25
HATALbR HATALbR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,946
Titoman:

What on earth is that suppose to mean? Would you mind a short re-statement (maximum of five pages please)?

*******************************************************
You know I adore you Tito...but don't even start in on

Putin.

I'll want you for breakfast. Hee.

********************************************************

C-ya in the personals

Love,
Natasha
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 26th September 2002, 23:55
titoman titoman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,175
Quote:
Originally posted by HATALbR
Titoman:

What on earth is that suppose to mean? Would you mind a short re-statement (maximum of five pages please)?

*******************************************************
You know I adore you Tito...but don't even start in on

Putin.

I'll want you for breakfast. Hee.

********************************************************

C-ya in the personals

Love,
Natasha
What did you have in mind. That he puts it in, or that he is a Bonapartist?

"He puts it in." Is just nothing particular. You know "Put-in".....

You can understand "put-in" in many ways.


Bonapartist, I have written about that on some other
occasion.

Bonapartism:

First used in reference to the government established by Louis Bonaparte, who had been elected to the office of presidency in 1848. Three years following, on 2 December, 1851, he staged a coup d'etat against his government, setting up a military dictatorship in its place.

Marx soon after wrote a popular pamphlet called the Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte "demonstrating how the class struggle in France created circumstances and relationships that made it possible for a grotesque mediocrity to play a hero's part."

Bonapartism has been used to describe a government that forms when class rule is not secure and a military, police, and state bureaucracy intervenes to establish order. Nineteenth century Bonapartism is commonly associated with Twentieth century fascism and stalinism.



__________________

“Nature is the proof of dialectics, and it must be said for modern science that it has furnished this proof with very rich materials increasing daily.”

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 27th September 2002, 20:48
HATALbR HATALbR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,946
Titoman:

Privyet!!

I see you were making a bit of a joke; I'm just so used to your utterly serious side.

Natalie
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +3. The time now is 02:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC4 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.