Russian scientist screws over American Empire and NATO

[Stelios]

Anti-weapons: Russian Scientists threaten to halt Space War
by Vladimir Bogdanov
Rossiyskaya Gazeta (Moscow) October 18, 2002
globalresearch.ca , 23 November/ novembre 2002

... "It was the chairman of the radio club of Yugoslavia, Khranislav Milocevic. Valentin Kashinov answered. The Yugoslav described the great destruction and casualties caused by strikes of NATO aircraft, "HARM" air-to-ground missiles, and Tomahawk cruise missiles. Milocevic asked for help in fending off these bombardments. Valentin Vladimirovich immediately inquired if they had any microwave ovens. This was followed by a puzzled silence, and then: "Of course!" Kashinov advised that they get some ordinary microwave ovens and aim them upwards, with doors open, around an installation they wanted to protect, and then turn them on. Khranislav understood at once. The fact was that an American HARM missile would home in on any strong source of radio emission in the 400-10,000 MHz range, exactly the range of conventional household microwave ovens. Literally the next day following this conversation, NATO forced bombed their own embassies in Belgrade."

"NATO pilots were fooled, and bombed microwave ovens instead of Serbian tanks for nearly half the time of the air attacks."

"According to a British officer who spent six months in the region and offered his own assessment of bombing damage, the Serbs lured the NATO planes using household microwave ovens to simulate the emissions of armored transport systems."

"The NATO propaganda machine initially announced that more than 100 tanks, 250 APCs, and 389 cannon had been destroyed. These damage figures have since been revised, since independent observers found only 13 tanks knocked out. As it turned out, the same targets were targeted (and destroyed) repeatedly by different pilots."

"A NATO officer who gave an anonymous interview to the British Herald stated that only three tanks were found. "The Serbs use a lot of tricks to elude NATO bombs. The use of microwave ovens from houses in Kosovo to thumb their noses at the alliance was only one of their ruses.""

"The beauty of Serbian countermeasures lay in the fact that it demanded nothing of them, since they used 100-dollar decoy devices (microwave ovens) which were available in every household. And the guided bombs cost around 30,000 dollars.. They also studied Iraq's experience in the "Gulf War" (or rather, "Desert Fox," when they jammed the American GPS satellite system)."

"As for the military operation "Desert Storm" against Iraq in 1991, it is now clear that the Americans almost lost it, again thanks to the inventions of Russian scientist Valentin Kashinov. According to information from the Reuters agency, at the time American planes in Iraq were able to hit less than a third of their marked targets. Most of the bombs dropped on Iraq failed to hit their targets. Most of them "hit the sand," as they say. According to reports from US Navy representatives, the bombs fell at a distance of several tens of meters from the target. Of twenty-five radars, only eight were destroyed. Nearly all the guided AGM-154A bombs deviated sharply to the left. According to Navy representatives, this was because of an error in the guidance software system. But again the Americans prevaricated. The simple fact was that the entire space guidance system didn't work." ...


Read the whole story: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BOG211A.html (I just pasted a short excerpt.)

[Octavio]

This is a good post. No replies though: lack of interest will fade when cheap E-bombs start showing up all over the place.

Imagine New York or London in the aftermath of a (non-nuclear) EMP attack. An E-bomb can be constructed by a high school student. Imagine all computers fried. No police radios working; no phones working; most cars not working; power grid down; etc. etc. Utter mayhem. Field day for criminals and opportunists of all kinds.

This scenario is the future. Not only in a formal war theater (as the article referred to) but in the "everyday" electronic milieu, people will be thrown back on "low tech" alternatives.

It would be wise to own implements of personal defense and survival which contain no electronics at all. And be prepared for every basic public service to fail at any time.

Octavio

[Stelios]

Well this site is being tag-teamed by two camps of idiots:

the Panturks
and ultra conservative Americans

So I was not surprised at the lack of replies.

[Internationalist_81]

Hey, this is no surprise. Everyone who's done a bit of follow-up on US military campaigns realizes how exaggerated the success of advanced weaponry tends to be. In the Gulf War, it was reported that Patriot missiles knocked out 90-95 percent of incoming Scuds. By the mid-1990s, the Pentagon had to revise the figure to about 60 percent. Then an independent study was done by a group of top scientists in academia, which concluded that the percentage of Scuds intercepted was closer to ZERO.

[Stelios]

Kind of like the attack on the WTC. They were saying as many as 5,000 were killed at first.

I do not watch the news. What was the latest estimate of the number dead?

The US government purposely hands out this disinformation and the corporate media goes straight to the government as a source for its news.