Go Back   Russia.com Discussion Forum > Society > Russian Politics


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 6th January 2003, 03:23
red_fury red_fury is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 132
George W. and his Cabinet just ain't happy unless the U.S. is threatening to kick some ass somewhere. They've mistaken themselves for emperors and now blithely advocate first-strike use of nuclear weapons, as though they are immune to radioactivity.

Clearly, the fall of the Soviet Union has left them addled. Having no rivals of consequence, the U.S. corporate powers that own the president and Congress now openly make plans for a hostile takeover of the world! And the Democratic legislators, with few exceptions, are signing up for Georgie Porgie's war party right alongside their Republican brethren.

This is the latest phase in a permanent state of warfare U.S. rulers have engaged in since World War II. Now the "war on terrorism" has morphed into a war for "regime change" in Iraq. But before you get on board, there are a few facts you should know.

Why Bush is targeting Iraq now

The main reason Bush is launching the war drive now is to change the domestic agenda before the November election. He does not want discussion of the pitiful economy or corporate corruption, and he needs to keep the military machine humming along despite the failure of U.S. spy agencies to find any real terrorists. So old enemy Saddam Hussein becomes the new enemy.

Super power, super lies

Bush accuses Hussein of being engaged in developing nuclear weapons and having ties with Al Qaeda. Not true.

Nine thousand UN inspections of Iraqi weapons facilities took place from 1991-98. Two former chief inspectors, Rolf Ekeus of Sweden and Scott Ritter of the U.S., charge that the U.S. tried to provoke the Iraqis into blocking inspections so that it could call for direct military action. Today Ritter states unequivocally that "no substantive facts exist" to back up Bush's charge that "Iraq continues to possess and seek the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction."

How about chemical weapons? In the 1980s, the Iraqis used chemical weapons as they fought Iran with U.S. backing. Current Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld himself met with Hussein in Baghdad during that period and voiced no objections. And during the 1991 Persian Gulf war, it was the U.S., not Iraq, which used tons of depleted uranium as a chemical weapon, as it did again later in Yugoslavia.

Is there a link between Al Qaeda and Hussein? No believable proof has been offered. Like other Islamic fundamentalists, Al Qaeda considers secular Arab rulers like Hussein part of the problem and in need of forcible overthrow.

Oil: the booty of war

The powerful oil industry is constantly on the prowl for plunder, and Iraq sits on the largest oil reserve in the world outside of Saudi Arabia.

Oil companies are already maneuvering with the Iraqi National Congress, a totally corrupt government-in-exile that favors creation of a U.S.-led consortium to develop Iraq's oil fields once Hussein is ousted. The U.S. is using access to future oil rights to try to hold Russia, China, and France in line behind its war of oil piracy.

War is good for General Dynamics

Of important Bush appointees, 32 have ties to top weapons contractors as former executives, consultants, or major shareholders. These include the secretary of the Navy, previously a General Dynamics vice president, and the undersecretary of the Air Force. These men, who will return to private industry in a few years, have an indisputable material interest in pushing ever-greater military spending. It is estimated that by 2007 the "defense" budget will be $469 billion, 11 percent more than the Cold War average.

This bloated war spending is the pay- off to weapons contractors for their lavish campaign contributions and lobbying bonanzas, which in 2000 alone totaled $66.5 million.

Of body bags and chicken hawks

The loudest advocates in the Bush administration for aggression against Iraq have never been in battle — including the president, Rumsfeld, and Dick Cheney — and most evaded military duty in Vietnam.

These bellicose officials, labeled the "chicken hawks," don't give a damn about the thousands of casualties that will result from their single-minded pursuit of oil and power. The body bags will not contain their sons and daughters. The rich never die in capitalist wars of plunder.

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 8th January 2003, 05:14
KGB-CCCP KGB-CCCP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 229
There is clearly only 1 reason for the war in Iraq, and that reason is oil. Anybody who doesn't understand that is probably a retard.

Andrei
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 8th January 2003, 05:35
carter carter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,398
Oil?

Canada, Russia and Venezuela would all make better oil trophies so beware. America yearns for bigger Japanese made SUVs, we won't be stopped till we got 'em either.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 8th January 2003, 20:21
red_fury red_fury is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 132
Nope, You'll have to kill all nation of IRAQ to get to Saddam, his nation is prepared to donate their blood for him!
I did not see many americans creating a human shield to Bush
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 26th January 2003, 14:58
red_fury red_fury is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 132
Jee..it's aufully still in this topick...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 26th January 2003, 15:48
rikbe rikbe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Flanders/Jutland
Posts: 5,945
Quote:
Originally posted by red_fury
Nope, You'll have to kill all nation of IRAQ to get to Saddam, his nation is prepared to donate their blood for him!
I did not see many americans creating a human shield to Bush
No, he doesn't need it, but for Saddam, it is all he has.
__________________


Diderot:
A deist is someone who has not lived long enough to become an atheist.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 27th January 2003, 00:23
cepguu cepguu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 119
Angry


A moderately sizeable anti-war demo took place in Prague today. The speakers explained again and again: "This is our individual act of conscience... This does not absolutely not mean that we support the communists..."

It does seem as though the post-Soviet-communist spiritual flu might have another decade or two's life cycle, with every thinking process more or less ending with some such refrain: "... but surely we are free now and everything is a thousand times better than before... and everyone is happy and making money and buying houses in this beautiful new age except for those Palestanian and Arabic terrorists and left over commie losers... how can we be against America, the country that pioneered this life for us, the leader of democratic free world..."

Significantly, a recent poll in Czech Rep. suggests that the majority of those over 60 and those under 22 to be against the war, and those between the age of 35 to 50 to be overwhelmingly in favor. One could understand why: memories of 1968... all those years of listening to Radio Free Europe in secret...

Ironical but probably inevitable truth: a credible global opposition against America's single minded march to hegemonic domination could only emerge after a even more thorough wave of Americanization of life, in most countries.

(Vaclav Havel, the heroic former dissident, the beacon of "moral courage", pleaded and pressured his parliament to pass the proposal to sent the anti-chemical Czech unit in one day, saying "this is our moral responsibility" etc.)

Sigh... tomorrow the inspectors present their reports. Only a matter of days or weeks now...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +3. The time now is 04:56.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC4 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.