us and russia

[Yakov_Leskov]

Originally posted by ahem

Ýõ ïèíäîñ, ñèäåë áû òû â ñâî¸ì Ïèíäîñòàíå äà ïîìàëêèâàë, ìîæåò çà óìíîãî ñîø¸ë áû.

could u pplz write that in phonetics at least

[Balamut]

Duh.
Ok
CAn I call sniper an idiot?

[Balamut]

Duh.
Ok
CAn I call sniper an idiot?

[USMC_ReCoNSnIpeR]

USA has the best military and technology anylone think differeny tell me why. M1A2 Abrams is the bewt tank out there.

[ahem]

Originally posted by eyeradi8
Bala, you don't need my permission. But do you really think Sniper is an idiot? What is your reasoning? In my opinion, you should build a case to make such an accusation.

Me personally, I've witnessed Ahem's density on several different posts now, so feel comfortable with my deduction.

I wonder if you have the courage to say that to my face. But you wouldn't, as life humbled you greatly, and you come here because here you seem to yourself smart and strong, but you can't enter a normal civilised discussion because you are not able to, so you start offending everybody because they can not physically react to it. But the thing is, this forum is not real life but eventually you do have to go into real life. As uncle Remus' tales said "A smart one is played by a fool.", there is much wisdom in those words...

Ah, I can image your answer to that allready Pinoccio, another offensive post full of swearing and in which you will, once again, state your superiority. I pity you.

[ahem]

Your friend had a first hand expirience with AN-94? You have a friend who is a Russian special operative, or knows one very well? Don't make me laugh. You've studied detailed technocal drawings of AN-94? Will you tell me next that you work for FSB? I never accussed you of not "being qulified" to rate it, I said that you know nothing about it. Information on it that is available on it is very much misleading, and as a matter of fact, AN-94 has been a complete system since 1994, and has been accepted and used by the army since then. Why don't you rate AEK-971?

What are Radio Moscow and Voice of Russia? There are quite a few programs about space on Russian television, some of which deal on american moon landings. You really should take the patch off your eyes, the debate of american moon landings has been on for quite a while. France officially does not except it. This is not a rumor, nor an opinion.
Wh don't you try to research something before stating it?
And by the way could you explain to me how can a flag beat in the wind in vaccum? And, please stop the baby talk about intercepted signals,a probe can land on the Moon without humans, in fact our probe was thee first. Russian man landing operation was terminated because Russia did not have the technology to land a live human being on to the Moon and bring him home agin alive. A major cause for it was radiation, NASA never disclosed how it overcame that problem, I wonder why. Your attitude towards other ideas shows you to be a bigot.

So, Mir was a piece of sh1t, was it? I wonder what it makes Space Shuttles. Yes, most people did want to leave it in space, but any museum requires money to be kept. Mir did not fall down, it was brought down remotly, you surely should know that.

"Your revelation about the Cold War.... "
And of course, it was USSR that bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and, of course, it was USSR that said that USA and all capitalists would be next.


"On the ISS... "

Why, oh, why doesn't the site say anything about the beggining of ISS. You obviously never heard of NASA buying a prototype of "Energiya" after "Challenger" either.

"It's just a start, but it does point out that the ISS is not quite an old Soviet blueprint that was dusted off and built in a Russian factory with American Greenbacks. "

Well, the station reminds me of Mir rather than of Skylab. Hm, actually the blocks look very much like those that made up Mir.

"The U.S. elements include three connecting modules, or nodes; a laboratory module; truss segments; four solar arrays; a habitation module; three mating adapters; a cupola; an unpressurized logistics carrier and a centrifuge module. The various systems being developed by the U.S. include thermal control; life support; guidance, navigation and control; data handling; power systems; communications and tracking; ground operations facilities and launch-site processing facilities."

Well, the american developed systems have been ditched since 1999. Have you asked yourself the site says "U.S. elements iclude" and not "U.S. developed elements include"?

"Aircraft.... "

I never said that a CPU was a negative element of a modern fighter, I said that an aircraft that can't fly without a CPU is not a very good aircraft. The reason why Russian aircraft did not incorporate FBW systems before, was that the aircraft was build for real war, something USA never expirienced. You never answered my question about one fighter.

Sikorskiy, became an american? Was Rahmaninov an american too? You really do not understand what a nationality and culture are, only Russian heeled Jewish half-breeds like eyradi8 become americans. Sikorskiy said that Soviets use their helicopter as tractors, something unimaginable for US helicopters to achieve. You should research his life in USA a bit more, as many of his decendants left USA.

Tupolev swore when anybody mentioned B-52, he said that no real aircraft designer would design such a thing, so ugly it was. What does Stlin making aircraft designers copy planes have to do with the subject? Tu-4 was never realy produced because it was not a very good plane, and was copied because of lack of time, just like Space Shuttle was copied because of lack of time.

Russian designers do respect the final product of american designers potent military assets ( I've said this before) but as aircraft, no. And most designers do think that our aircraft are better.

"Many more years than it took the capitalists do get there. "
Once again you are mistaken. The concept of a stratigic bomber was entirely Russian (Sikorskiy's), and the first strategic bomber was Russian - Iliya Muromets.

"By the way, the TU-160 is the only real strategic bomber that Russia currently has in it's fleet. "

Do you know what "strategic bomber" means. it means a bomber that can hit stratigic targets, which both Tu-22M3 and Tu-95 are capable of.

"Your remark about current Russian fighters having no equal " I never said that Russian fighters have no equals, I said that Russian aircraft have no equals, and they don't. Care to mention any western plane that can perform a kulbit?

"No matter how badly the idea burns in your gut, both Russia and the US have a great deal of talent, and much in common. The two countries are well on the road to becoming economic and scientific partners. "

Yes, and the recent talks in camp David proved that...


P.S. to: Arkasha.

Your metaphoras are striking! Could you not come up with anything else? I guess that it is not a coinsidence that Arkasha rymes with "parasha".

[ahem]

Originally posted by USMC_ReCoNSnIpeR
Ahem the US pays 25% of the fee to the UN that's the most by far. and also what country doesnt have school shootings. Russia probably has alot more cause its so currupt. u cant deny that. PLUS we already won the afgahn and iraq war each was less then a month u idiot. we are facing more casualties rebuilding it and securing it then in the aciual war. only like 100 ppl died in the acual war. then like 200 died in the streets caused its a closed in area and u cant control that so shut up. Also dude if it werent for the Us that would would bacially suck. The US gives away BILLIONS in food,elecronics, and other supplies to india and othre poor places cause its our obligation u idiot. The Us has 70% of the worlds firepower. Also 50% of the money in the world is on the US. We got largest airforce,navy, in the world. best military technology. if we didn't we wouldnt be a super power.

In 2002 USA had not payed UN for quite a number of years. I don't remember any school shootings occuring in Russia, in american Germany yes, but not in Russia. You said that your father is an Vietnam war veteran, ask him what a war is and then ask him what does he think of Iraqi "war". US not only does not give anything to India, it inposed sunctions on it. What does 70% of firepower supposed to mean? 50% of money? I believe that US does not even have a gold reserve backing its currency.
And where is that best technology seen?